<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Binary Turf &#187; Forum: Firefox - Recent Topics</title>
		<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/</link>
		<description>Technical Support Forum</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/rss/forum/firefox/topics" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Fishos on "Blazing Fast Thunderbird?"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/blazing-fast-thunderbird#post-2639</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 07:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Fishos</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2639@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi, I love the optimized Blazing Fast Firefox builds. I was wondering if there'd be any chance to see optimized Thunderbird builds as well from you? I use Thunderbird all the time and it would be very useful to have it optimized!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks,&#60;br /&#62;
Ido
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>steve.marks59 on "When will you have a build for Firefox 7?"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/when-will-you-have-a-build-for-firefox-7#post-2514</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>steve.marks59</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2514@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Since Firefox 7 is now officially released I have been hoping for an SSE2 32bit build and have been checking every day. Thanks.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>quisnox on "Firefox x64 SSE4.2 request"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/firefox-x64-sse42-request#post-2420</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>quisnox</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2420@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I want Firefox x64 SSE4.2 (or 4.1) build to use with my Intel Core i5 :) It’s possible? Just have brand new laptop with x64 Windows 7 and wanna try new CPU power : )
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>aysz88@gmail.com on "Blazing Fast 6.0.2?"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/blazing-fast-602#post-2492</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>aysz88@gmail.com</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2492@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Firefox 6.0.2 has come out (for a week or so now), including a few security things such as an SSL certificate revocation - any chance of BlazingFast 6.0.2 soon?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>brianj on "Where can I download Blazing Fast 5.0?"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/where-can-i-download-blazing-fast-50#post-2499</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>brianj</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2499@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I've install BF 6, however, i've found out that BF 5 is far more stable for memory leaks, where can I download your past release? or any unique URL i can download BF 5? thanks before.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JoCat on "Working with themes other than default"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/working-with-themes-other-than-default#post-2290</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 17:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JoCat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2290@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;In the past colourful tabs has worked fine with other themes.   For years i've had it running with a mozilla approved theme.  After today's upgrade to firefox 4 which forced an upgrade of colourful tabs it no longer works if I retain myredcats(green) theme.  Which I intend to do.   &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is this something i can expect to see return as compatibility - actually allowing the user to customise a customisable option - or will you be continuing with it as is and on the basis that everyone can just use the default theme if they want colourful tabs?  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I realise there are a lot of things which you can't guarantee compatability with but it would seem allowing a theme other than the ugly, heavy default appearance is likely to be a popular one amongst those who like to customise the appearance of their browser with addons like colourful tabs.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Runatik on "I&#039;d like a duplicate Firefox (that means I&#039;d like to run 2 at once)"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/id-like-a-duplicate-firefox-that-means-id-like-to-run-2-at-once#post-2441</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 06:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Runatik</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2441@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;This is the advice I've received, but the misunderstanding was that I wanted to run a different version, no, I don't unless I must.  (Comments for newbie/boneheads, pls):&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;I said it was possible to install two different versions of Firefox on the same hard drive (in the install wizard, specify a different install location, like &#34;C:\Program Files\Mozilla\Waterfox&#34;); however, I didn't recommend it because having older and newer versions of the same software installed simultaneously can cause problems. A prime example of this is when Adobe products (Reader and Acrobat) fight for dominance.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Can I ?  And How To Do It ?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pierro78 on "Win64 Firefox (blazing fast) 6 beta release ?"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/win64-firefox-blazing-fast-6-beta-release#post-2436</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pierro78</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2436@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hey Folks,&#60;br /&#62;
Do you plan on releasing a Win64 Firefox (blazing fast) 6 beta ?&#60;br /&#62;
Thanks !
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oleg on "WMP Plug-In Issue"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/wmp-plug-in-issue#post-2223</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2223@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Seems like WMP Plug-In &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.interoperabilitybridges.com/windows-media-player-firefox-plugin-download&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.interoperabilitybridges.com/windows-media-player-firefox-plugin-download&#60;/a&#62;  does not work in Firefox 4.0 SSE2 32bit
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oleg on "Firefox 4.1 32bit request"</title>
			<link>http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/firefox/firefox-41-32bit-request#post-2252</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 09:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2252@http://www.binaryturf.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I would like to see Firefox 4.1 32bit (SSE2) build.&#60;br /&#62;
Thanks.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

